image image

    High Yield:

    Time in the market beats timing the market?

    High Yiled: Time in the market beats Timing the market?

    April 22, 2025 Fixed income

    High yield may offer best value to those invested for the long term, rather than range trading. Investors looking to enter the market at attractive levels should, in our view, consider long term allocations.

    • Range trading the high yield market may, in our view, deliver “index-minus” returns over the long-term.
    • Tariff-related volatility may however offer a compelling entry points for long-term allocations.
    • In our view, yields and spreads may offer what investors fundamental require: compelling compensation for default risks

    “Buying low and selling high” may not work in high yield

    We back-tested several hypothetical US high yield range trading strategies – all designed to “buy low and sell high”. Each buys the index1 when spreads widen to a historically high trigger level and sells into cash when spreads tighten to a lower trigger level.

    We found multiple variations consistently underperformed a simpler strategy of holding the index over the long term (Figure 1).

    Figure 1:Timing high yield entry and exit points has seldom offered any value (hypothetical results)2

    timing.svg

    The one strategy that did (just) outperform since 2000 is captured by the light green bubble. It buys when spreads hit 700bp and sells at 300bp. It benefited from being invested in cash instead of the high yield market during the post pandemic rate hikes.

    The 350bp / 550bp strategy (dark grey), chosen for its proximity to the median average spread of ~450bp, was also close to the index, but likely underperformed significantly when considering transaction costs (which are ignored here), particularly given its relatively narrow trading band.

    Other strategies consistently underperformed.

    How can “buying low and selling high” not guarantee the best returns? 

    A trading strategy may deliver capital gains over time, but credit asset returns have historically been driven by income. Since 2000, the high yield index had returned 6.6% pa in total, with +7.6% coming from income and -1.0% from price moves3.

    You need to be invested to harvest income.

    To us, the takeaway is clear: in our view time in the market beats timing the market.

    It could nonetheless be a compelling entry point for a long-term allocation

    High yield all-in yields are currently trading at their highest levels since June 2023 (Figure 2), with a potentially compelling balance of “risk free” yields and spreads and yields, potentially offering a mutual stability buffer.

    Figure 2: Yields and spreads are compelling in our view3

    spr_bdown.svg

    Tariff-related disruption may nonetheless threaten a rise in defaults.

    However, if we project default scenarios (accounting for historical 47% average recovery rates4) into the next 12 months, we find that default losses may have to be in line with deep recessions or disruptions (such as the pandemic), before the realized yield even falls below investment grade levels (Figure 3).

    Figure 3: Credit currently spreads offer ample compensation for default risks in our view5

    yield_defs.svg

    Market pricing may also offer some cushion. CCCs have been pricing in increased stress relative to the default rate in recent years, implying the market is already priced for rising defaults (Figure 4).  

    Figure 4: Market pricing already reflects a normalization of default risks6

    ccc_app.svg

    Conclusion – It may be a compelling time for a long-term high yield allocation

    We believe that high yield may be the risk asset of choice for the current environment. In our view investors should focus on the potential for sustainable long-term income in the asset class because we believe time in the market beats timing the market.

     

    image
    Download the whitepaper
    252 kb
    Back to top